10-22-2014, 01:44 PM
To make some of you feel better they were looking at stats in baseball and the chances of a weaker team winning a seven game series.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/10/15/whos-for-a-269-game-world-series-anyone-anyone/">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/ ... ne-anyone/</a><!-- m -->
So when you lose a close one it might really just be bad luck as opposed to your team sucking.
Quote: And if the superior team could beat its opponent, on average, 2 out of 3 times they meet, the inferior team will still win a 7-game series about once every 5 match-ups. There is really no way for a sports league to change this. In the lopsided 2/3-probability case, for example, you’d have to play a series consisting of at minimum the best of 23 games to determine the winner with what is called statistical significance, meaning the weaker team would be crowned champion 5 percent or less of the time. And in the case of one team’s having only a 55-45 edge, the shortest significant “world series†would be the best of 269 games,
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/10/15/whos-for-a-269-game-world-series-anyone-anyone/">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/ ... ne-anyone/</a><!-- m -->
So when you lose a close one it might really just be bad luck as opposed to your team sucking.
